News

d-CON fires back at the EPA

BY Ken Clark

Reckitt Benckiser’s d-CON brand says it will not be banned without a fight.

Not only did the pesticide brand say it will challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s move to ban 12 d-CON mouse and rat poison products from the market, a d-CON spokesman shot back an accusation that the EPA’s move is bad public health policy. 

Last week, the EPA announced a move to ban the sale of the d-CON mouse and products produced by Reckitt Benckiser because these products fail to comply with current EPA safety standards.

“d-CON believes that EPA’s announcement puts the public health of millions of American families at risk,” said Hal Ambuter, director of regulatory and government affairs for d-CON products, in an email to HomeChannelnews.com. “We are deeply concerned that the EPA is trying to restrict access to essential safeguards that protect our families and our children from the serious public health dangers associated with rodent infestation. 

Among the 12 d-CON products on the list to ban are: d-CON Concentrate Kills Rats & Mice, d-CON Bait Packs III, d-CON Ready Mixed Generation II, and d-CON Bait Pellets III. The complete list can be found here.

The products remain on shelves as the manufacturer has 30 days to request a hearing.

“d-CON has been committed to developing products that protect public health for more than 50 years,” wrote d-CON’s Ambuter. “We will vigorously challenge EPA’s actions to ensure that these effective and affordable rodent control products remain available to consumers to protect their homes and families for generations to come.”

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

POLLS

How much credit should be given to the co-op business model for the success of the independent hardware and building supply dealer over the last half century?
News

California lumber assessment

BY HBSDEALER Staff

Normal.dotm
0
0
1
677
3861
LF
32
7
4741
12.0

0
false

18 pt
18 pt
0
0

false
false
false

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

By Ken Dunham, Executive Director, West Coast Lumber & Building Material Association

Normal.dotm
0
0
1
7
42
LF
1
1
51
12.0

0
false

18 pt
18 pt
0
0

false
false
false

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

With California’s controversial “lumber assessment” now being assessed on most lumber products sold in the state under so-called “emergency” regulations from the state’s tax collection agency, the State Board of Equalization (BOE), the next process for the state agency is to develop permanent rules including a permanent retailer set-up reimbursement.

The reimbursement language was contained in the legislation but the “emergency” rules passed by the BOE in October 2102 provided a token $250 per retail location. The BOE voted 3-2 on political party lines to approve the $250, with the two Republicans on the board voting against the low reimbursement.

The West Coast Lumber & Building Materials Association (WCLBMA) testified at the hearing that their research and survey data showed lumber retailers had an average set-up cost of more than $4,500 per location.  The association also requested an ongoing $1,500 per year to cover the costs of new products being added or deleted from the list of lumber items.

The BOE is expected to vote on a permanent reimbursement amount in May 2013.  WCLBMA has re-submitted updated data and survey results showing the average cost is closer to $5,400 per retail location.

The legislation providing for the one per cent assessment on a wide range of lumber products was pushed by Democratic Governor Jerry Brown and agreed to by California timber producers who claimed they were at a competitive disadvantage to out-of-state timber producers who have lower costs and fees paid to state agencies for timber management oversight and regulation in producing “timber harvest plans.”

The controversial legislation also contained language that claimed to limit legal damages to timber companies and others for “wildfire liability,” a contention disagreed with by many, including the U.S. Attorney’s office in Sacramento

The challenge for California lumber retailers is that this “assessment is significantly more complicated than increasing a sales tax in that it is imposed on only certain lumber and building products and not on others. This means lumber retailers have to reconfigure their computer systems to add the assessment to only the covered wood products.

An additional challenge is that the new law requires that this one per cent assessment be shown separately on the invoice, not shown with state or local sales taxes.

The manner in which the legislation was passed has been criticized by many involved in the process. Ken Dunham, Executive Director of the West Coast Lumber & Building Material Association, which represent independent lumber retailers,  said,  “This was passed in the last hour of the 2012 legislature, using a so-called ‘emergency’ rule that meant the bill could be rushed through with no public hearings and no chance of discussion.“

He also noted,” Closed door meetings and vote deals to get exactly the number needed to meet the two-thirds vote requirement were part of the final deal.”

Jon Coupal, president of the California-based Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, called the legislation “one of the sleaziest legislative deals I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen a lot”.

Dunham noted, “While we certainly agree that the timber industry is over-regulated and there are valid issues that need resolution, simply giving the state more money from the general public and making the lumber retailers collect it is not the answer.”

“This is a bad deal the timber producers made with the governor to pass on regulation costs to the general public,” he added.

Dunham noted that every Democratic member of the state assembly and senate voted for the bill, under pressure from Democratic Governor Jerry Brown. They were joined by three Republicans, all of whom were out of their current positions at the end of the legislative session because of term limits, and were joined by a Republican-turned-Independent assembly member who had already lost an earlier 2012 primary election for San Diego mayor.

The concept of an additional assessment on timber producers to cover the cost of regulation by the State of California has been discussed by state government for several years. Private land owners in California are subject to some of the most difficult, expensive and over-reaching environmental rules in the nation. Nearby states have far less restrictive land use laws putting the California producers at a competitive disadvantage.

In the past, the costs of the state regulation have been part of state agency budgets and fees imposed on the timber producers.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

E.ROBERTS says:
Feb-01-2013 06:10 pm

This is just another example
This is just another example of the California state governments war on small businesses. The Democratic party that controls all the levers of power in California seems determined to do everything in their power to harm any business that continues to try to survive in California. The law has been discussed for 7 years but it suddenly needed to pass as an emergency measure in the middle of the night. A good example of the disfunctional state government. Brown ran on a pledge of not raising taxes without a vote of the people but that was apparently a lie. The BOE requested almost $1,000,000 to upgrade their computer systems but they feel that $250 per location will cover the costs for the effected lumber dealers. If this didn't damage us so much it would be funny.

TRENDING STORIES

POLLS

How much credit should be given to the co-op business model for the success of the independent hardware and building supply dealer over the last half century?
News

Sales up 1.6% at Newell Rubbermaid

BY Ken Clark

Normal.dotm
0
0
1
196
1119
LF
9
2
1374
12.0

0
false

18 pt
18 pt
0
0

false
false
false

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

Atlanta-based Newell Rubbermaid’s fourth quarter sales increased 1.6% to $1.52 billion. For the full year, sales increased 0.6% to $5.90 billion.

“We are pleased with our quarterly and full year 2012 performance,” said president and CEO Michael Polk. “Our solid fourth-quarter financial results represent the sixth consecutive quarter of consistent delivery in line with or better than expectations.”

The Tools segment net sales for the fourth quarter were $209.5 million, a 3.6% increase compared with the prior-year quarter. Core sales in the segment increased 6.0%. The improved performance was driven by strong growth in emerging markets, particularly Latin America. Operating income in the Tools segment was $23.8 million, or 11.4% of sales, compared with $30.3 million, or 15.0% of sales, in the prior year.

Improved productivity was more than offset by unfavorable mix, inflation and ongoing investment in sales force expansion in Latin America and an increase in customer programs, the company said.

In addition to Rubbermaid, Newell Rubbermaid’s brands include Irwin, Lenox, Sharpie, Graco and Calphalon, to name a few.

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

POLLS

How much credit should be given to the co-op business model for the success of the independent hardware and building supply dealer over the last half century?